Anybody who reads my blogs knows I've been very happy with Google Voice ever since it's launch a few years back. Just see any of these articles:
How Google Voice Can Help Landlords
Followup and Detailed Review of Google Voice
Google Voice Opens the Flood Gates Today
Google has done a TREMENDOUS job with Google Voice and I continue to use it daily for my personal voicemail and call forwarding. I've found however that more and more recently when calls route through google voice they don't ring my phones or the call gets cut-off prematurely. This is not a huge deal with my personal calls, it's infrequent enough to be tolerable and the benefits of GV on my personal calls outweigh this drawback; however, since the issue has persisted intermittently for months and Google has no customer service or technical support to contact regarding the issue I've thrown in the towel for business calls.
My goals were to keep the same distributed infrastructure our employees are used to. Everyone may have one or two phones, a Skype voice account, plus a cell phone, that they want to be contacted at. Google Voice would forward through these with ease. I wanted to maintain this functionality, as well as having a permanent record of all voicemails. After much research, trials, and quality testing - the answer is Grasshopper!
Grasshopper supports all of the features I used with Google Voice.
- Custom call routing to an unlimited number of phones, check.
- Online permanent record of all voicemails, check.
- Visual voicemail - although I haven't yet tried this. They provide the option of human transcription at a cost too which would probably be more reliable than GV's transcription.
And Grasshopper's virtual phone system adds these great features which I'm already using.
- Multiple inbound phone numbers (GV only supported one)
- Virtual PBX - Yes, this is GREAT. I can have a real call queue: "Press 1 for sales, 2 for support, etc". Based on the callers entry the call can be routed to different phones. Each queue has it's own set of forwarding numbers. In addition, each employee gets an extension for direct calls. Couldn't do any of thise with GV.
- Built in eFax support. I used to pay another efax company to process electronic faxes for us, but this is now included with Grasshopper.
- You can upload recordings, including professionally recorded MP3 files. GV required you record your own over the phone lines which always ended up being a low quality recording.
- Real customer service. I've called three times, and every time the phone was picked up in less than 30 seconds with a very helpful and well trained rep on the line.
Thus far I'm very pleased with our choice to switch over from GV to GH. Grasshopper however does have a cost, where GV is free. However, since we provide an 800# for all of our customers to call it turns out we're actually saving money and improving our phone system and image simultaneously. How? I used to pay an 800 service to forward inbound 800 calls to our GV number. The cost was 6.9c/minute (I know, we were getting robbed). With GV they handle the 800 # and the rate we pay is closer to 2.5c/minute. So yes, we've improved our phone system and dropped our 800# phone bill nearly in half. Can't squawk at that!
---
Nathan is a member of Rentec Direct who provides property management software, tenant ach payment processing, and tenant screening for property managers and landlords.
I wrote about Google Voice a while back and provided a
It might seem really basic to order criminal reports on prospective tenants, but there certainly is more to it than meets the eye. One of the most common problems landlords run into when running background criminal is how criminal reports are indexed. Unlike credit where every person has a unique identifier, their SSN, criminal reports are typically indexed only by name and birth date.
I subscribe to Google Alerts to alert me when something within my field pops up on the internet. One such alert I received this morning was labeled "10 Myths about Web Based Property Management Software". Obviously as I work with a web based property management software company this peaked my interest and I read the article. It got me thinking, there is a lot of dis-information on the web. This article I came across in particular wasn't entire inaccurate and it was just designed to plug their non-web based software; however, property management software aside, I would like to debunk some myths about Web Based Software in general.
Myth #2 Debunked - This myth states that because the software is web based the data has to travel thousands of miles back and forth before it can be displayed. This one is not only mis-informed, but pretty silly to bring up in the first place. Data on the internet travels at the speed of light, this is a known fact. Most cloud based applications are located with 1000 cable miles of the subscriber. So even accounting for network overhead and possible congestion, most web applications transfer the data between the server and the client (customer's monitor) in less than 50 milliseconds (yes, that's 5/100ths of a second).
Craigslist is an EXCELLENT tool for listing rentals, in fact, it's so excellent I've heard more propery managers say they get more leads from craigslist than from any other source. Managing my own rentals, I can say the very same thing. Craigslist is an excellent medium to get the word out about your vacancy.
I was reading a property management advertisement the other day from a property management company trying to earn my business and on their information sheet they say "less than 1% of our leases end up in court". 1%?!!?!? So as many as 1 in 100 leases end up in court. They were bragging about this, so perhaps other property managers are 2 in 100 or more? That tells me that of all the industries I participate in, the property management (landlord) industry by far and away spends more hours in a courtroom than any other that I'm aware of.
I know I'm not the only one out there that has a nagging feeling in their head when the beginning of the month rolls around. I pro-rate my tenants so they are all due on the first, and typically give a 3 day grace. There's the select few tenants that pay on the 1st. That breed of tenants has mostly vanished. The remainder tend to push that grace limit to it's maximum and come in on the 3rd or 4th of the month. The whole time I'm worried if they will be in at all. If the 5th rolls around and nobody is around, just the thought of notices and eviction sets me on fire because I know it's going to be a painful process no matter what and at the very least will strain the landlord-tenant relationship.
HUGE BENEFITS! Aside from being able to sleep better knowing that the rent payments are going to happen automatically, one enormous benefit of doing automated ACH is longer term tenants. Studies have shown that services that are paid automatically are less likely to be cancelled. This is one of the very reasons the utility companies push ACH. For a landlord this means less turnover. How would you feel if your vacancy rate went from 30 days/year down to 10 days/year? It's possible. Another big benefit is your payment always gets priority. Set the deduction day the day following the tenant's paycheck and generally banks process electronic payments (ACH) before paper checks. You get your money before anyone else.
Wouldn't it be nice if your computer would be so kind as to give you this message "Your Computer Is About To Crash. Backup Now!". Unfortunatly it won't, and as a result many of us will be left with a busted computer and a loss of data.
Voicemail Transcription - I'll start with my favorite anticipated feature. Google's answer to Apple's visual voicemail. They up the ante and transcribe your voicemails into text for you and provide them online, and forward them via email or SMS. No longer is it required we login to our phones and punch in our secret code to listen to the voicemail only to jot the notes down on a notepad. Google eliminates this step and I am really excited about this. How well will it work?
